Censored by the State: Wyoming House Kills Bill restoring Citizen Free Speech

Wyoming citizens deserve unfiltered, direct communication with their elected officials. Yet, thousands of emails from constituents to their legislators have been blocked by the State’s email quarantine system—silencing voices and possibly violating constitutional rights.

Honor Wyoming recently learned that these emails have been blocked through the State’s email quarantine system.  Whether wittingly or unwittingly, the Wyoming Legislative Services Office has been censoring communications with legislators. A potential violation of both the First Amendment of the United States Constitution and Section 20 of the Declaration or Rights in the Wyoming Constitution.  

Honor Wyoming sent the following letter to the Legislative Services Office as well as key lawmakers:

The situation raises significant questions about free speech and the ability of citizens to communicate with their elected representatives, which are core principles protected by both the U.S. Constitution and the Wyoming Constitution. 

Let’s break it down.

The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees the right to free speech and the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. Blocking emails from voters to legislators infringes on these rights, especially if it prevents citizens from expressing their views or seeking action from their representatives. Courts have consistently held that government actions restricting speech or access to officials must meet a high bar—typically a compelling state interest and narrow tailoring—to be constitutional. If the Wyoming state email system is “silently” quarantining thousands of voter emails without clear justification, notification, or an appeals process, it could be argued that this constitutes an unreasonable barrier to these First Amendment rights.

The Wyoming Constitution, in Article 1, Section 20, also protects free speech, stating: “Every person may freely speak, write and publish on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right.” Additionally, Article 1, Section 21 guarantees the right to petition: “The right of petition … shall never be denied.” If the state’s email quarantine system is systematically preventing communications from reaching legislators without voters’ knowledge, it would be violating these provisions by effectively denying citizens their ability to speak to and petition their elected officials.

The highest order of protected speech is political speech between citizens and their lawmakers.  And a bill was filed in January to correct this problem by ensuring ALL emails reach lawmakers, stopping government censorship in its tracks. HB338 would have ensured transparency and accountability by requiring daily updates on blocked emails and a process for removing wrongful quarantines.

And yet in a dangerous blow to free speech, the Wyoming House of Representatives, under the leadership of Speaker Chip Neiman and Majority Leader Scott Heiner, refused to hear the bill during the 2025 legislative session.  

HB338 simply required that not less than one (1) time per day on each legislative day during a legislative session, the legislative service office had to publish or update a list of all internet domain names and internet protocol addresses that are being quarantined or prevented from delivering email to legislators in any way. 

Any person whose email communications to legislators that had been quarantined by the Legislative Services Office would have been able to contact the Legislative Service Office to request that their current and future emails be removed from quarantine and delivered to legislators. The Legislative Service Office would then have to remove requested domain names or internet protocol addresses from quarantine and allow delivery from the name or address within two (2) days of receipt of the request unless the release from quarantine or allowed delivery poses an actual security threat to the information technology systems of the state of Wyoming.

The fact that House leadership refused to take action on HB338 creates the appearance that this is more than a technical glitch; there might be a systemic restriction on constitutional rights.

Public trust in government agencies and politicians is at an all-time low.  Conservative grassroots America has been censored, shadow-banned and silenced to the point that there is zero patience or appetite for any more missteps when it comes to their First Amendment rights.  Especially here in Wyoming.  

It is paramount that our lawmakers work together to assure Wyoming voters that the days of government agencies engaging in the censorship business are behind us.  We need political leadership that proactively takes a stand for Protecting Free Speech between Citizens and their Lawmakers.

Political Integrity Content Challenge: How should younger generations contribute to increasing political integrity in WY?

Are you passionate about politics? Do you believe Wyoming’s future depends on integrity in leadership? Here’s your chance to speak up!

Honor Wyoming and the University of Wyoming TPUSA chapter are inviting students to participate in our Political Integrity Content Challenge. We want to hear from you:

The prompt: How should younger generations contribute to increasing political integrity in Wyoming?

🗳️ What is Political Integrity?

Honoring your commitments to your constituents.  Voting according to your party lines.  Honesty.  Doing the right thing even when it’s not popular.  Political integrity means exercising political power consistently in the public interest, independently of private interests, and not using power to maintain your own wealth and position.

✍️ Submission Options

Choose the format that best fits your style:

Please email submissions to: [email protected] by April 30th, 2025

 

Judging Criteria

Entries will be scored based on:


🏆 Prizes

 

Teton County Illegal Immigrant Sanctuary Status

Since February 2023, ICE’s Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) has issued 118 detainer requests to Teton County Sheriff Matt Carr’s Office, asking the local agency to hold illegal immigrants in the jail for up to 48 hours until ICE could take over custody.  According to an ICE statement, 103 of those detainers fell apart after Teton County Sheriff’s Office let the suspects go before ICE could get them.

“Additionally,” the statement continues, “Teton County Sheriff’s Office does not notify (ICE’s operation) before releasing noncitizens from their custody, limiting (our) ability to take timely action on these cases.”

Teton County Sheriff’s Office is responsible for allowing illegal immigrants to slip away before they can be dealt with by the proper authorities.

Wyoming’s U.S. Representative Hageman has recently brought light to the subject:

“Teton County does not honor lawfully issued ICE detainers. Teton County has released criminal illegal aliens despite the fact that ICE has requested them to be held pursuant to U.S. immigration law,” wrote Hageman. “It is my understanding that every other county in Wyoming honors ICE detainer requests; the very ones that Teton County refuses to acknowledge.  Why is it that it’s Teton County that is having this issue?” asked Hageman.

She said some of the illegal immigrants were arrested on suspicion of driving while intoxicated or sex crimes.

“The people in Teton County and the surrounding area should be terribly concerned that (authorities are) releasing illegal aliens into the community, that have criminal records or that have been arrested for things that would actually qualify for them to at least go through the process for deportation,” Hageman said.

ICE also reported in a statement that things haven’t worked smoothly between the two agencies since an official talk with Democrat Sheriff Matt Carr on Feb. 22, 2023.  The statement explained that Sheriff Carr informed ICE that the Sheriff’s Office would only detain noncitizens based on a court request accompanied by a judge’s signature and that the sheriff’s office was pulling out of its intergovernmental service contract with ICE’s operations team.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement currently lists Teton County as a non-cooperative sanctuary jurisdiction

Take Action Now! Wyomingites need to let Teton County officials know that this lawless behavior is not ok in our state. Fill out THIS FORM and send an email to let your voice be heard.

 

Left-Wing News Media Bias Growing in WY

Trust in the news media by the American people is at an all-time low, especially among those on the right side of the political spectrum. You would think that news outlets and their reporters would respond by rededicating themselves to journalistic integrity. Unfortunately, many instead choose to double down on left-wing bias.  Equally disappointing is that Wyoming news media outlets are not immune.

To illustrate this increasing bias, we deconstructed a recent Wyofile article written by Maya Shimizu Harris covering the “takeover” of the Legislature by Wyoming’s “far-right movement”. Harris is a freelance journalist whose articles about the recent elections have been filed as “featured top stories” rather than “opinion,” yet they are full of obvious biases.

In this article on September 21, Harris characterized the contest between Julie Jarvis and incumbent Jeanette Ward as that of a moderately conservative heroine fighting against a radical, aggressive, and dishonest far-right, book-banning villain.

Despite WyoFile claiming on its webpage the goal of reestablishing “the primacy of facts in Wyoming’s public discourse,” this article instead provides a perfect case study in news media bias. Harris uses positive and empathetic language to describe Jarvis while framing Ward in a controversial or even negative light.

How has this type of partisan bias come to infiltrate Wyoming news media organizations?  In Wyofile’s case, we can consider influences like sitting Democratic State Representative Liz Storer from Jackson. Representative Storer serves as the president of her family’s private foundation which happens to be a major financial supporter of Wyofile.  It seems reasonable to think such liberal funding sources help drive biased reporting.  As well as the fact that WyoFile is the Wyoming partner of a national DC-based nonprofit known as States Newsroom. According to Influence Watch, States Newsroom was initially founded to promote progressive ideas and is led by veterans of the left-wing policy world. 

It is fair and reasonable to ask if outlets such as WyoFile are truly interested in unbiased local news reporting or if they are laundering progressive ideas into red states like Wyoming.

In her article, Harris describes Jarvis as a reluctant, thoughtful candidate who is uncomfortable with the aggression in the political system. Jarvis is portrayed as a mother, a fourth-generation Wyomingite, and someone who values listening to the people she represents.

Harris frames Jarvis’ initial reluctance to run for office as a virtue, portraying it as evidence of her humility and integrity. Her political associations, such as with Americans for Prosperity, are shown in a positive, moderating light, and the imagery of the article is meant to make her appear wholesome and relatable.  Trying to frame her campaign as an organic grassroots affair but somehow failing to mention the multitude of special interest industry PACs that lined up behind her candidacy.  

Ward, on the other hand, seems to be treated differently. Harris repeatedly uses the phrase “far right” to describe Ward and her colleagues in the Wyoming Freedom Caucus, and even compares her to Marjorie Taylor Greene. Ward is described as a “lightning rod” due to her political experience in Illinois, and Harris frames her opposition to inappropriate materials in schools and libraries as opposition to transgender rights.

Jarvis’ victory is portrayed as a triumph of good over evil, like David slaying Goliath. Conversely, the fact that the Wyoming Freedom Caucus won enough seats to potentially control the next Legislature is presented as an ominous development, leaving the reader with a sense of impending doom.

There’s nothing wrong with authors crafting narratives from current events or telling stories from one perspective. There’s also nothing wrong with publishing opinions about political figures. However, there is an issue when narratives and opinions are labeled as “news.” The reality is that the people of Wyoming are far more conservative than the authors and editors of outlets like WyoFile, as voters of Wyoming just demonstrated by their strong support of Wyoming Freedom Caucus candidates and overwhelming opposition to longtime political power brokers. Yet, this article — and others on WyoFile — treat this grassroots majority as a fringe minority, a “far right” group of extremists out of step with the mainstream.  Trying to obscure the inconvenient election math that clearly establishes who actually is the mainstream.

Perhaps these news organizations should take a closer look at their own positions and ask whether they are measuring themselves by the people of Wyoming or by the ideas emanating from Washington, DC via States Newsroom and other large media conglomerates. The people of Wyoming deserve a news media that is fair, objective, and treats them with respect — not disdain.

 

Wyoming Becomes a Destination for Abortion Tourism: Is This the Future We Want?

Wyoming Becomes a Destination for Abortion Tourism: Is This the Future We Want?

A recent search on AbortionFinder.org reveals that at least three private foundations are currently offering financial assistance to women from other states to travel to Wyoming for abortion services. This development raises important questions about Wyoming’s legal stance 

Wyoming law permits abortions up to the point of viability, which can be as late as 26 weeks into a pregnancy. This legal framework places Wyoming among a small number of states where abortion access is relatively unrestricted, comparable to states like California and New York, which are known for their pro-abortion laws. As a result, Wyoming has become a destination for women from states with stricter abortion laws seeking access to the procedure.

After the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, returning the authority to regulate abortion to the states, Wyoming lawmakers acted swiftly. They passed HB 152, known as the Life is a Human Right Act, with overwhelming support (81%). This bill repealed existing viability laws and aimed to protect unborn children while leaving exceptions for cases of rape, incest, and when the life of the pregnant woman is at risk.

However, this legislation was quickly challenged in court. A lawsuit was filed by a group of pro-abortion advocates, including:

The lawsuit was strategically filed in the 9th District Court of Teton County, known for its more liberal leanings. Nearly a year and a half later, Judge Melissa Owens has yet to rule on the constitutionality of the Life is a Human Right Act. In the meantime, the law remains in legal limbo, and Wyoming has become a haven for abortion tourism.

As the debate over abortion continues to unfold in Wyoming, many are left asking: Is this the future we want for our state? The delay in the judicial process has created a situation where Wyoming is increasingly seen as a destination for abortion, raising concerns among pro-life advocates and lawmakers who want to see stronger protections for unborn children.

If you believe that Wyoming should prioritize the protection of unborn children and reexamine its abortion laws,  consider sharing this information with others in your community.

Is the Cowboy State Daily Showing Political Bias? Evidence Suggests Yes

Independent research has revealed that the Cowboy State Daily, one of Wyoming’s largest news outlets, may be providing biased political coverage, favoring politicians who receive donations from its owner, Wayne Hughes.

Wayne Hughes, a California businessman, relocated to Wyoming in 2017 and quickly became a major player in state politics. Records from the Wyoming State Campaign Finance database show that Hughes contributed more than $595,000 to various political campaigns during the 2020 and 2022 election cycles. Then, in February 2022, Hughes acquired the Cowboy State Daily, a prominent Wyoming publication. Since then, concerns about potential political bias in the newspaper’s reporting have emerged among Wyoming residents.

An independent analysis conducted on 562 articles published by the Cowboy State Daily after Hughes assumed ownership reveals a significant disparity in how the publication covers Wyoming lawmakers and political candidates. The study found that:

Media outlets like the Cowboy State Daily are not required to report positive coverage as a political contribution, nor are they obliged to disclose that their ownership has made financial donations to the figures they cover. This raises ethical questions about transparency in media, particularly when coverage can influence public perception.

Wyoming voters deserve transparent reporting from their media, especially when there may be a conflict of interest. A simple solution would be for the Cowboy State Daily to include disclaimers in articles that mention political figures who receive support from Wayne Hughes or his political action committee (PAC). This would give readers a clearer understanding of any potential bias in the coverage.

If you believe that Wyoming citizens deserve more transparency from one of their largest news outlets, consider sharing this information with others in your community. In an era where media influence can shape elections and policy, it’s crucial that voters are well-informed and aware of potential biases in the news they consume.

Wyoming families carrying burden of energy taxes and incentives

By the time you get your bill, it’s too late. Wyoming customers of Rocky Mountain Power are reeling after the company requested a 14.7% rate hike, following earlier increases this year of 5.5% and 9.3%. The company attributes the latest hike to wildfire risk and investments in renewable energy, offering little comfort to the thousands of customers watching their electric bills soar.

Governments at all levels are spending trillions of dollars to transition the country to so-called renewable energies like wind and solar. They justify this investment by citing statistics that claim these sources are cheaper than fossil fuels, but these numbers are often criticized as only applying when the wind is blowing or the sun is shining. To provide the consistent energy Wyoming residents need, coal remains essential.

The fact that Rocky Mountain Power customers are seeing higher rates as the company invests in renewable energy reveals the fallacy of thinking these technologies will lower costs. On the other hand, Wyoming exports more electricity than it consumes, raising the question: why are residents being subjected to rising rates?

Decisions about divesting from fossil fuels, how much electricity to export, and even how to manage wildfire risks are made by politicians and the bureaucrats who serve them. Yet, voters rarely consider their electric bills when casting ballots. Is the candidate you’re voting for in the Legislature likely to support policies that increase your bills? Will the governor’s political appointees choose to export more electricity while charging you to build additional wind and solar farms?

Last year, several bills aimed at increasing taxes on wind companies failed to pass the Wyoming Legislature. One bill sought to repeal a three-year tax exemption for the industry. Currently, wind companies are charged $1 per megawatt hour of generated electricity, but only starting in their fourth year of operation. Industry leaders argued that such measures would reduce investment in Wyoming’s wind sector, even though these companies already receive $27.50 in federal credits for every megawatt hour produced in their first ten years.

The energy industry operates under a Byzantine system of taxes and incentives, with governments at every level distorting the economic playing field. In the end, it’s the citizens who lose—paying for this social engineering both directly, through their electric bills, and indirectly, through taxes that subsidize these industries.

We need leaders at the state and national levels who will put citizens first — not green energy schemes that only seem to drive prices higher.