Bill
# SF043
Conservation District Supervisor Contracting
.png)
Current Progress
In Commitee
Committee to have public testimony
Text this bill number to 307-370-1600 to receive alerts on a change in
status of this bill.
Take Action Now
Summary
Bill Description
AN ACT relating to conservation districts; repealing a provision requiring conservation district supervisors to have funds immediately available to satisfy the entirety of a contract prior to entering into the contract; and providing for an effective date.
Notes
This bill is a fiscal disaster waiting to happen, stripping away a critical safeguard for Wyoming's conservation districts and exposes taxpayers to unnecessary risks. By repealing W.S. 11-16-123(b)—the requirement that district supervisors must have full funds available before signing any contract—it invites irresponsible spending, potential debt accumulation, and a culture of financial recklessness. This move prioritizes short-term convenience for bureaucrats over long-term accountability, betraying the public trust and saddling future generations with the consequences. It's not just poor policy; it's an abdication of responsibility that could lead to mismanagement, fraud, and financial calamities.
The core of this bill—repealing the full-funding mandate—eliminates a commonsense rule that prevented districts from over-committing resources they didn't have. Conservation districts, tasked with vital work like soil erosion control and water management, rely on limited funding from mill levies, grants, and state aid. Without this requirement, supervisors can now enter multi-year or large-scale contracts on a whim, betting on future revenues that may never materialize due to economic downturns, grant cuts, or shifting priorities.
This sets the stage for ballooning deficits: Imagine a district signing a $500,000 contract for land restoration equipment, only to face a funding shortfall midway through. Taxpayers would then foot the bill through emergency bailouts or increased levies, turning conservation into a high-stakes gamble. Akin to writing checks your account can't cash, but on a public scale that could drain millions from state coffers.
Morally, this bill is indefensible because it undermines the ethical duty of public officials to steward taxpayer dollars with prudence and transparency. The original provision was a moral firewall, ensuring that every contract was backed by real money, not empty promises. Repealing it opens the door to cronyism, where supervisors might award contracts to favored vendors without verifying funds, potentially leading to corruption or wasteful "pet projects" that benefit insiders over the environment.
In conclusion, this bill is a profoundly fiscally irresponsible and immoral piece of legislation that dismantles a vital check on public spending. It reflects a cavalier attitude toward taxpayer money and ethical governance, and the lawmakers sponsoring this bill should be ashamed for pushing it forward.
Rejecting such measures is essential to preserving fiscal integrity and moral accountability in the state—anything less is a disservice to Wyomingites.
View on Wyoming LSO
Understanding the chart below
Each phase is highlighted with a colored/uncolored bar to show the latest activity.
Waiting for Committee Assignment
In Commitee
In Chamber
Governor's Desk
Senate
House
Waiting for Committee Assignment
Waiting for Committee Assignment
In Commitee
In Commitee
In Chamber
In Chamber
To next chamber
Governor's Desk
Committee to have public testimony